| Do You Have A Right to Police Protection?
by Bill (05/12/2000)
One of the basic themes of gun control is that only the police and military should have handguns or any type of firearm. I cannot explain their rationale, other than to say that gun control proponents must believe that the police exist to protect the citizenry from victimization. But in light of court decisions we find such is not the case. You have no right to expect the police to protect you from crime. Incredible as it may seem, the courts have ruled that the police are not obligated to even respond to your calls for help, even in life threatening situations!. To be fair to our men in blue, I think most officers really do want to save lives and stop dangerous situations before people get hurt. But the key point to remember is that they are under no legal obligation to do so. |  |
 | David Galland and Stephen McBride (1) |
| |
| A Journalist Who Wishes to Remain Anonymous (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Business Age (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Anonymous (1) |
| |
| Wayne Stump, Arizona State Senator (1) |
| |
| Robert Armengol (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Dr. John W. Baer (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Robert Batemarco (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Larry Becraft (2) |
| |
|
| |
| Bill Benson (1) |
| |
|
| |
| William Blase (2) |
| |
| Boston Committee of Correspondence (1) |
| |
| James Bovard (1) |
| |
|
| |
| J. Dianne Brinson and Mark F. Radcliffe (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Leslee Dru Browning (1) |
| |
| Major General Smedley Butler (1) |
| |
| Major General Smedley Darlington Butler (1) |
| |
| Patrick S. J. Carmack (1) |
| |
| Greg Caton (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Noam Chomsky (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Erin Collins (1) |
| |
| Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing (1) |
| |
| Duhaime & Company (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Jordyn Cormie (1) |
| |
|
| |
| © Roy Davies & Glyn Davies, 1999 (1) |
| |
| Alexis de Tocqueville (1) |
| |
 | Frederick Douglass (1) |
| |
| | What Shall Be Done with the Slaves If Emancipated?
Douglass' Monthly, January, 1862
by Frederick Douglass (01/01/1862)
This question has been answered, and can be answered in many ways. Primarily, it is a question less for man than for God—less for human intellect than for the laws of nature to solve. It assumes that nature has erred; that the law of liberty is a mistake; that freedom, though a natural want of the human soul, can only be enjoyed at the expense of human welfare, and that men are better off in slavery than they would or could be in freedom; that slavery is the natural order of human relations, and that liberty is an experiment. What shall be done with them? | |
| Duke University (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Zoe Eisenberg (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Steve Elliott (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Louis Even (1) |
| |
| Securities and Exchange Commission (1) |
| |
| Farm Journal (1) |
| |
|
| |
| National Center for Constitutional Studies (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Albert Friedberg (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Georgetown University Advanced Vehicle Development (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Skip Goebel (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Viktor S. Grebennikov (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Max Greenwood (2) |
| |
|
| |
| G. Edward Griffin (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Emil Guillermo (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Paul Harvey (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Patrick Henry (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Ron Holland (1) |
| |
|
| |
| Publius Huldah (1) |
| |
|